Detergent-free parasite transformation and replication assay for drug screening against intracellular Leishmania amastigotes.

Leishmaniasis is an infectious disease caused by protozoan species in the genera Leishmania and Endotrypanum. Current antileishmanial drugs are limited due to adverse effects, variable efficacy, the development of resistant parasites, high cost, parenteral administration and lack of availability in endemic areas. Therefore, active searching for new antileishmanial drugs has been done for years, mainly by academia. Drug screening techniques have been a challenge since the intracellular localization of Leishmania amastigotes implies that the host cell may interfere with the quantification of the parasites and the final estimation of the effect. One of the procedures to avoid host cell interference is based on its detergent-mediated lysis and subsequent transformation of viable amastigotes into promastigotes, their proliferation and eventual quantification as an axenic culture of promastigotes. However, the use of detergent involves additional handling of cultures and variability. In the present work, cultures of intracellular amastigotes were incubated for 72 h at 26 °C after exposure to the test compounds and the transformation and proliferation of parasites took place without need of adding any detergent. The assay demonstrated clear differentiation of negative and positive controls (average Z´ = 0.75) and 50% inhibitory concentrations of compounds tested by this method and by the gold standard enumeration of Giemsa-stained cultures were similar (p = 0.5002) and highly correlated (r = 0.9707). This simplified procedure is less labor intensive, the probability of contamination and the experimental error are reduced, and it is appropriate for the automated high throughput screening of compounds.

The Effectiveness of Washing Clothing Contaminated With Cyclophosphamide: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Measures to prevent exposure to anticancer drugs mitigate health hazards for caregivers, family members, and healthcare workers caring for patients with cancer. Previous studies have reported that anticancer drugs were detected on the linens of patients receiving chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of the washing methods recommended by Japanese guidelines for linens contaminated with cyclophosphamide (CTX). METHODS: This study used 15 shirts contaminated with 10 mg of CTX divided into three study groups washed with or without detergent, with or without an additional clean shirt. The CTX level on each shirt was measured after washing. Residual CTX levels on the shirts were compared to the measurable level of 1 ng/cm2 as a criterion for evaluating efficacy. FINDINGS: Washing a garment twice, as recommended in the Japanese guidelines, is effective in removing CTX contamination from clothing with or without detergent. However, contaminated garments should be washed separately from uncontaminated clothing.

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 on the Army Combat Uniform and Recommendations for Cleaning.

SARS-CoV-2 is the virus responsible for the disease that is known as COVID-19. While there have been numerous studies detailing the survival rates of SARS-CoV-2 on various materials, there are currently no published data regarding whether this virus is stable on standard military uniforms. Consequently, there are no standard operating procedures for washing uniforms once exposed to the virus. This study aimed to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 could be removed from Army combat uniform material by washing with a commercially available detergent and tap water. Washing the fabric with detergent followed by a rinse step with tap water effectively removes detectable viral particles. Importantly, it was found that washing with hot water alone was not effective. Therefore, it is recommended that military personnel wash their uniforms with detergent and water as soon as possible after exposure to SARS-CoV-2; hot water should not be used as a substitute for detergent.

[Two rare cases of severe hyponatremia with consciousness disorder following bowel preparation and high fluid intake].

Symptomatic hyponatremia due to bowel preparation is extremely rare, but it can cause severe neurological symptoms and require hospitalization. We report our experience with two cases of symptomatic hyponatremia after bowel preparation. Our findings suggest that the cause of hyponatremia may be not only oral bowel cleansing agents but also high fluid intake. Adjusting the dose and pace of oral bowel cleansing agents and fluid intake;rehydration should be considered to prevent any recurrences.

Evaluation of solvent/detergent-treated plasma safety and efficacy in orthotopic liver transplant and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Solvent/detergent-treated, pooled plasma (SDP) is approved for use in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) patients; however, studies evaluating safety and effectiveness of SDP in these populations are limited. METHODS: This prospective study included two cohorts: OLT patients (n = 40) who received either SDP (n = 20) or FFP (control group) (n = 20), and TTP patients (n = 20) who received either SDP (n = 10) or FFP (control group) (n = 10) throughout hospitalization. Medical, laboratory, and blood bank records were retroactively assessed for both cohorts for differences in clinical outcomes, laboratory values, and transfusion data from admission to discharge. RESULTS: In the OLT cohort, significant changes in AST and ALP were observed in the control group as compared to SDP (p < .05 each), and creatinine levels improved significantly in the SDP group as compared to the control group (p < .05) from admission to discharge. In the TTP cohort, platelet counts were significantly improved within the control and SDP groups from admission to discharge, but there were no significant differences between groups (p = .31). LDH levels improved between admission and discharge for both groups (70% decrease in the control group, p < .001, and 80% decrease in the SDP group, p = .001). There were no significant differences detected in clinical outcomes in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: As evidenced by the lack of adverse events in either cohort and similar clinical outcomes, we conclude that SDP is comparable in safety and effectiveness to FFP in OLT and TTP patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential for improved safety with SDP.

Approach to the Patient with Chronic Pruritus.

Chronic pruritus (itch lasting ≥6 weeks) is a bothersome chief complaint that may present in a broad variety of diseases. Most itch-causing diagnoses fit into 1 of 5 categories (inflammatory, secondary to systemic disease, neuropathic, chronic pruritus of undetermined origin, and psychogenic itch) and this broad differential can be narrowed using key findings in the history and physical. In this article, we discuss which key findings are most pertinent for narrowing this differential and guiding further workup and treatment, as well as how to treat many itchy conditions.

Wound cleansing for treating venous leg ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Leg ulcers are open skin wounds that occur below the knee but above the foot. The majority of leg ulcers are venous in origin, occurring as a result of venous insufficiency, where the flow of blood through the veins is impaired; they commonly arise due to blood clots and varicose veins. Compression therapy, using bandages or stockings, is the primary treatment for venous leg ulcers. Wound cleansing can be used to remove surface contaminants, bacteria, dead tissue and excess wound fluid from the wound bed and surrounding skin, however, there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of cleansing and the best method or solution to use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of wound cleansing, wound cleansing solutions and wound cleansing techniques for treating venous leg ulcers. SEARCH METHODS: In September 2019 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound cleansing with no wound cleansing, or RCTs comparing different wound cleansing solutions, or different wound cleansing techniques. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened studies for their appropriateness for inclusion, assessed their risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and used GRADE methodology to determine the certainty of evidence. Two review authors undertook these tasks independently, using predetermined criteria. We contacted study authors for missing data where possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included four studies with a total of 254 participants. All studies included comparisons between different types of cleansing solutions, and three of these reported our primary outcomes of complete wound healing or change in ulcer size over time, or both. Two studies reported the secondary outcome, pain. One study (27 participants), which compared polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) solution with saline solution for cleansing venous leg ulcers, did not report any of the review's primary or secondary outcomes. We did not identify any studies that compared cleansing with no cleansing, or that explored comparisons between different cleansing techniques. One study (61 participants) compared aqueous oxygen peroxide with sterile water. We are uncertain whether aqueous oxygen peroxide makes any difference to the number of wounds completely healed after 12 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 3.20). Similarly, we are uncertain whether aqueous oxygen peroxide makes any difference to change in ulcer size after eight weeks of follow-up (mean difference (MD) -1.38 cm2, 95% CI -4.35 to 1.59 cm2). Finally, we are uncertain whether aqueous oxygen peroxide makes any difference to pain reduction, assessed after eight weeks of follow-up using a 0 to 100 pain rating, (MD 3.80, 95% CI -10.83 to 18.43). The evidence for these outcomes is of very low certainty (we downgraded for study limitations and imprecision; for the pain outcome we also downgraded for indirectness). Another study (40 participants) compared propyl betaine and polihexanide with a saline solution. The authors did not present the raw data in the study report so we were unable to conduct independent statistical analysis of the data. We are uncertain whether propyl betaine and polihexanide make any difference to the number of wounds completely healed, change in ulcer size over time, or wound pain reduction. The evidence is of very low certainty (we downgraded for study limitations and imprecision). The final study (126 participants) compared octenidine dihydrochloride/phenoxyethanol (OHP) with Ringer's solution. We are uncertain whether OHP makes any difference to the number of wounds healed (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.72) or to the change in ulcer size over time (we were unable to conduct independent statistical analysis of available data). The evidence is of very low certainty (we downgraded for study limitations and imprecision). None of the studies reported patient preference, ease of use of the method of cleansing, cost or health-related quality of life. In one study comparing propyl betaine and polihexanide with saline solution the authors do not report any adverse events occurring. We are uncertain whether OHP makes any difference to the number of adverse events compared with Ringer's solution (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.14). The evidence is of very low certainty (we downgraded for study limitations and imprecision). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a lack of RCT evidence to guide decision making about the effectiveness of wound cleansing compared with no cleansing and the optimal approaches to cleansing of venous leg ulcers. From the four studies identified, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate whether the use of PHMB solution compared with saline solution; aqueous oxygen peroxide compared with sterile water; propyl betaine and polihexanide compared with a saline solution; or OHP compared with Ringer's solution makes any difference in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Evidence from three of the studies is of very low certainty, due to study limitations and imprecision. One study did not present data for the primary or secondary outcomes. Further well-designed studies that address important clinical, quality of life and economic outcomes may be important, based on the clinical and patient priority of this uncertainty.

ANTECEDENTES: Las úlceras de la pierna son heridas cutáneas abiertas que se producen por debajo de la rodilla, pero por encima del pie. La mayoría de las úlceras de la pierna son de origen venoso, y se producen como resultado de la insuficiencia venosa, en la que el flujo de sangre a través de las venas se ve afectado; suelen surgir debido a coágulos de sangre y venas varicosas. El tratamiento de compresión (vendas o medias) es el tratamiento principal para las úlceras venosas de la pierna. La limpieza de la herida se puede utilizar para eliminar los contaminantes superficiales, las bacterias, el tejido muerto y el exceso de líquido de la base de la úlcera y de la piel circundante; sin embargo, no se sabe con certeza cuál es la efectividad de la limpieza ni cuál es el mejor método o solución a utilizar. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar los efectos de la limpieza de heridas, las soluciones de limpieza de heridas y las técnicas de limpieza de heridas para el tratamiento de las úlceras venosas de la pierna. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: En septiembre de 2019 se hicieron búsquedas en el Registro especializado del Grupo Cochrane de Heridas (Cochrane Wounds Group), en el Registro Cochrane central de ensayos controlados (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (incluido In­Process & Other Non­Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase y EBSCO CINAHL Plus. También se buscaron estudios en curso y no publicados en los registros de ensayos clínicos, y se examinaron las listas de referencias de los estudios incluidos pertinentes, así como de las revisiones, los metanálisis y los informes de tecnología sanitaria para identificar estudios adicionales. No hubo restricciones en cuanto al idioma, la fecha de publicación ni el contexto de los estudios. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se consideraron los ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) que compararon la limpieza de heridas con ninguna limpieza de heridas, o ECA que compararon diferentes soluciones de limpieza de heridas o diferentes técnicas de limpieza de heridas. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Se examinaron los estudios para determinar si eran adecuados para inclusión, el riesgo de sesgo se evaluó mediante la herramienta Cochrane "Risk of bias" y se utilizó el método GRADE para determinar la certeza de la evidencia. Dos autores de la revisión realizaron estas tareas de forma independiente, utilizando criterios predeterminados. Cuando fue posible, se estableció contacto con los autores de los estudios para obtener los datos faltantes. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron cuatro estudios con un total de 254 participantes. Todos los estudios incluyeron comparaciones entre diferentes tipos de soluciones de limpieza, y tres de ellos informaron sobre los desenlaces principales de esta revisión, cicatrización completa de la herida o cambio en el tamaño de la úlcera con el tiempo, o ambos. Dos estudios informaron sobre el desenlace secundario de dolor. Un estudio (27 participantes), que comparó la solución de polihexametileno biguanida (PHMB) con el suero fisiológico para la limpieza de las úlceras venosas de la pierna, no informó sobre ninguno de los desenlaces principales ni secundarios de la revisión. No se identificaron estudios que compararan la limpieza con ninguna limpieza, o que explorara comparaciones entre diferentes técnicas de limpieza. Un estudio (61 participantes) comparó el peróxido de oxígeno acuoso con el agua estéril. No hay certeza de que el peróxido de oxígeno acuoso suponga alguna diferencia en el número de heridas completamente cicatrizadas tras 12 meses de seguimiento (razón de riesgos [RR] 1,88; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 1,10 a 3,20). Del mismo modo, no hay certeza de que el peróxido de oxígeno acuoso suponga alguna diferencia en el cambio del tamaño de la úlcera tras ocho semanas de seguimiento (diferencia de medias [DM] ­1,38 cm2; IC del 95%: ­4,35 a 1,59 cm2). Por último, no hay certeza de que el peróxido de oxígeno acuoso suponga alguna diferencia en la reducción del dolor, evaluada tras ocho semanas de seguimiento mediante una calificación del dolor de 0 a 100 (DM 3,80; IC del 95%: ­10,83 a 18,43). La evidencia para estos desenlaces es de certeza muy baja (se disminuyó la calificación por las limitaciones del estudio y la imprecisión; para el desenlace dolor también se disminuyó la calificación por medidas indirectas). Otro estudio (40 participantes) comparó la propil betaína y la polihexanida con una solución salina. Los autores no presentaron los datos brutos en el informe del estudio, por lo que no fue posible realizar un análisis estadístico independiente de los datos. No se sabe si la propil betaína y la polihexanida suponen alguna diferencia en el número de heridas completamente cicatrizadas, en el cambio del tamaño de la úlcera con el tiempo o en la reducción del dolor de la herida. La evidencia es de certeza muy baja (se disminuyó por las limitaciones del estudio y la imprecisión). El último estudio (126 participantes) comparó el dihidrocloruro de octenidina/fenoxietanol (OHP) con la solución de Ringer. No hay certeza de que el OHP suponga alguna diferencia en el número de heridas cicatrizadas (RR 0,96; IC del 95%: 0,53 a 1,72) ni en el cambio del tamaño de la úlcera con el tiempo (no fue posible realizar un análisis estadístico independiente de los datos disponibles). La evidencia es de certeza muy baja (se disminuyó por las limitaciones del estudio y la imprecisión). Ninguno de los estudios informó sobre la preferencia de los pacientes, la facilidad de uso del método de limpieza, el coste o la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. En un estudio en el que se compara la propil betaína y la polihexanida con la solución salina, los autores no informaron la aparición de eventos adversos. No hay certeza de que el OHP suponga alguna diferencia en el número de eventos adversos en comparación con la solución de Ringer (RR 0,58; IC del 95%: 0,29 a 1,14). La evidencia es de certeza muy baja (se disminuyó por las limitaciones del estudio y la imprecisión). CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: En la actualidad se carece de evidencia de ECA para guiar la toma de decisiones sobre la efectividad de la limpieza de heridas en comparación con ninguna limpieza y los enfoques óptimos para la limpieza de las úlceras venosas de la pierna. A partir de los cuatro estudios identificados, no hay evidencia suficiente para demostrar si el uso de la solución PHMB en comparación con el suero fisiológico; el peróxido de oxígeno acuoso en comparación con el agua estéril; la betaína propil y la polihexanida en comparación con un suero fisiológico; o el OHP en comparación con la solución de Ringer supone alguna diferencia en el tratamiento de las úlceras venosas de la pierna. La evidencia de tres de los estudios es de certeza muy baja, debido a las limitaciones de los estudios y a la imprecisión. Un estudio no presentó datos para los desenlaces principales ni secundarios. Podría ser importante realizar más estudios bien diseñados que aborden desenlaces clínicos, de calidad de vida y económicos importantes, sobre la base de la prioridad clínica y para el paciente de esta falta de certeza.

Efficacy of Wound Cleansers on Wound-Specific Organisms Using In Vitro and Ex Vivo Biofilm Models.

Biofilms are believed to be a source of chronic inflammation in non-healing wounds. PURPOSE: In this study, the pre-clinical anti-biofilm efficacy of several wound cleansers was examined using the Calgary minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) and ex vivo porcine dermal explant (PDE) models on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Candida albicans biofilms. METHODS: A surfactant-based cleanser and antimicrobial-based cleansers containing ionic silver, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) were tested on the MBEC model biofilms with a 10-minute application time. Select cleansers were then tested on the mature PDE biofilms with 10-minute applications followed by the application of cleanser-soaked gauze. The PDE model was further expanded to include single and daily applications of the cleansers to mimic daily and 72-hour dressing changes. RESULTS: In the MBEC model, PHMB- and HOCl-based cleansers reduced immature MRSA, C albicans, and P aeruginosa biofilm regrowth by > 3× when compared with silver, surfactant, and saline cleansers. The major differences could be elucidated in the PDE model in which, after daily application, 1 PHMB-based cleanser showed a statistically significant reduction (3-8 CFU/mL log reduction) in all mature biofilms tested, while a NaOCl-based cleanser showed significant reduction in 2 microorganisms (3-5 CFU/mL log reduction, P aeruginosa and MRSA).The other PHMB-based cleanser showed a statistically significant 3 log CFU/mL reduction in P aeruginosa. The remaining cleansers showed no statistically significant difference from the saline control. CONCLUSION: Results confirm that there are model-dependent differences in the outcomes of these studies, suggesting the importance of model selection for product screening. The results indicate that 1 PHMB-based cleanser was effective in reducing mature P aeruginosa, MRSA, and C albicans biofilms and that sustained antimicrobial presence was necessary to reduce or eliminate these mature biofilms.

Synergistic Effect and Antibiofilm Activity of a Skin and Wound Cleanser.

INTRODUCTION: Biofilm in chronic wounds impedes the wound healing process. Each biofilm has differing characteristics requiring a multifaceted approach for removal while maintaining a surrounding environment conducive to wound healing. OBJECTIVE: In this study, 3 of the components in a wound cleanser are tested to determine synergy in eradicating biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 3 components assessed for synergy were ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid sodium salts (EDTA), vicinal diols (VD; ethylhexylglycerin and octane-1,2-diol), and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB). Each component was assessed individually and in combination while dissolved in a base solution. The Calgary assay method was used for biofilm growth and treatment. Kull Equation analysis for synergy was conducted using viable count results. RESULTS: Synergy is defined as the interaction of components to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate effects. The base solution containing all 3 components (EDTA, VD, and PHMB) reduced biofilm viability by more than 5 logs, demonstrating statistically significant synergy. The 3 components tested individually in the base solution resulted in the following: EDTA did not reduce bacteria viability; VD reduced viability by about 1 log; and PHMB reduced P aeruginosa viability by about 2.5 logs and MRSA viability by about 4 logs. Of importance, the MRSA biofilm failed to regrow in the recovery plates after combined treatment, indicating complete elimination of the biofilm bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: The experimental and calculated results indicate the 3 components (VD, EDTA, and PHMB) when used together act synergistically to eradicate MRSA and P aeruginosa biofilms in vitro.

Solvent detergent treated pooled plasma and reduction of allergic transfusion reactions.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) patients have increased risk for allergic transfusion reactions (ATR) due to the number of plasma products they require. This study evaluated the efficacy of solvent detergent treated plasma (S/D treated plasma) to reduce ATRs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All TTP patients who presented from April 2014 to February 2015 and experienced a moderate-severe ATR to untreated plasma with TPE were switched to S/D treated plasma (Octaplas) for their remaining procedures and included in the study. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The overall ATR rate per procedure decreased from 35.0% (95% CI = 15.4%-59.2%) with untreated plasma to 1.4% ([1/73] 95% CI = 0.0%-7.4%) with S/D treated plasma. The moderate-severe ATR rate decreased from 20.0% ([4/20] 95% CI = 5.7%-43.7%) with untreated plasma to 0.0% ([0/73] 95% CI = 0.0%-4.9%) with S/D treated plasma. The overall ATR rate per plasma unit decreased from 2.6% (95%CI = 1.0%-5.1%) with untreated plasma to 0.1% (95% CI = 0.0%-0.4%) with S/D treated plasma. No patients experienced VTE while receiving untreated plasma. Four patients experienced VTE events while receiving S/D treated plasma. All patients who experienced a VTE had additional risk factors for VTE. CONCLUSION: S/D plasma has promise as an effective product to reduce the risk of ATRs in TTP patients. Given the high risk of ATR in TTP patients, consideration of S/D plasma instead of untreated plasma for TPE in these patients may be warranted, especially for patients with a history of moderate to severe ATR. More extensive studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Evaluation of the total adenylate (ATP + ADP + AMP) test for cleaning verification in healthcare settings.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of cleaning methods is the first step in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. ATP hygiene monitoring tests are widely used for assessing the effectiveness of cleaning procedures. The test is easy to use and gives immediate results, however, ATP can be metabolized and degraded to ADP and AMP. Recently, a total adenylate [ATP + ADP + AMP(A3)] monitoring test has been developed. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of the A3 test for cleaning verification in healthcare settings. METHODS: The detection sensitivities of the ATP and the A3 tests were compared using blood, and debris derived from gloved-hand method and endoscopes immediately after endoscopic examination. The performance of the A3 test in monitoring cleanliness of high touch surfaces in the hospital and endoscopes at each cleaning step was also evaluated. RESULTS: For the hemolysate, the measurement values of the A3 test were stable, although ATP was promptly degraded. In debris from hands, the amount of A3 was 20 times higher than that of ATP. The detection sensitivities of the A3 test on residues derived from gastroscopes and colonoscopes were 3 and 8 times higher, respectively, than those from the ATP test. A field study indicated that a large number of microorganisms tend to show high A3 values on high touch surfaces in the hospital and on endoscopes. CONCLUSIONS: The A3 test showed higher detection sensitivities than the conventional ATP test for organic debris associated with healthcare settings.

Safety and efficacy of wiping lid margins with lid hygiene shampoo using the "eye brush", a novel lid hygiene item, in healthy subjects: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a lid hygiene brush prototype to wipe the lid margins with lid hygiene shampoo in subjects with normal meibomian glands. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 6 subjects were all evaluated just before and after wiping lid margins using 1) tap water alone, 2) Eye Shampoo, 3) Eye Brush, or 4) both products, each during a different week. The results after using both products twice daily for 1 month were also evaluated. Wiping efficacy was determined by post-wiping scores for the remaining fluorescein-stained 0.3% Tarivid ointment fully applied to eyelids and lid margins under microscopic view illuminated by blue light just after performing each of the four lid hygiene methods described above. RESULTS: No significant deterioration in ocular conditions occurred. Eyestrain, eye discharge, and dryness decreased with tap water (P = 0.020), Eye Shampoo (P = 0.036), and Eye Brush (P = 0.014), respectively. Sensations of eye discharge increased after 1 month of using both products (P = 0.042). The wiping efficacy of Eye Brush, Eye Shampoo or both was significantly greater than that of tap water alone (two-sided test, P = 0.003, 0.003, 0.002), and using both significantly increased efficacy above Eye Shampoo use alone (one-sided test, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Wiping lid margins using Eye Brush enhanced the cleansing power of Eye Shampoo. A daily healthcare routine using both products could be a safe and effective option for daily lid hygiene. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000016905 . Registration date: March 24, 2015; the study was prospectively registered.

Effect of Eyelid Hygiene Detergent on Obstructive Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of eyelid margin cleansing with lid hygiene detergent in patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). METHODS: As a pilot study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lid hygiene using tap water and/or lid hygiene shampoo in fourteen eyes of 7 normal subjects. All subjects were instructed to cleanse the eyelid margin with tap water and/or lid hygiene shampoo. As a main prospective clinical study, thirty-four eyes of 34 patients with obstructive MGD were enrolled. All subjects were instructed to cleanse the eyelid margin with lid hygiene shampoo at least once daily for 1 month. Ocular surface conditions were observed before and 1 month after study initiation. RESULTS: A significant exacerbating change (p < 0.05) was not detected after either method in the pilot study. In the main study, significant improvements were observed in tear break-up time (TBUT), lid margin lissamine green staining scores, vascular dilatation, and meibum status (p < 0.05). No significant improvements in corneal or conjunctival fluorescein staining scores, the mucocutaneous junction, lid margin deformation, or plugging were observed (p ≥ 0.05). Subjective improvements were observed in 27 subjects. Meibography revealed that 28 subjects had normal meibomian glands, and 6 subjects had meibomian gland atrophy. Significant improvements were observed in TBUT, vascular dilatation, and meibum status only in the group with normal meibomian glands (p < 0.05), but subjective symptoms and lid margin lissamine green staining scores improved in both groups (p < 0.05). No subjects experienced any problems throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Daily routine use of lid hygiene detergent can alleviate the symptoms of MGD regardless of meibomian gland atrophy.

The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retention of cemented crowns using zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty titanium specimens were fabricated to simulate prepared molars with minimally retentive taper. The Ni-Cr cast crowns were fabricated, temporarily cemented, and separated. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the temporary cement cleaning method (n = 10) as follows: control group (no temporary cementation), orange solvent group, ultrasonic cleaning group, and air-abrasion group. After the cleaning procedures, the specimens were cemented with definitive cements (zinc phosphate cement and resin-modified glass ionomer, RMGI, cement) and subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55°C, dwell time, 10 seconds). The tensile bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine, and the results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: When cemented with zinc phosphate cement, the statistical analysis showed that the value of the air-abrasion group was significantly higher than those of the other groups (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference among the other groups. When cemented with RMGI cement, the air-abrasion group showed the lowest value, and the control group showed the highest value (p < 0.01). The difference between the ultrasonic cleaning group and the orange solvent group was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The use of temporary cement did not have a significant influence on retention of permanently cemented crowns when zinc phosphate cement was used for permanent cementation. Airborne-particle abrasion after provisional cementation improved retention of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement; however, the use of temporary cement significantly decreased retention of permanently cemented crowns when RMGI cement was used regardless of the temporary cement cleaning method.

Selective prophylactic solvent-detergent plasma and cryoprecipitate transfusion to prevent intraventricular hemorrhage in extreme preterm infants: A case-historical control.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory evidence exists whether a prophylactic coagulation factor transfusion in the first hours of life (HOL) prevents intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in extreme preterm infants (EPI, <28 weeks gestation). We aimed to determine whether selective prophylactic solvent-detergent plasma and cryoprecipitate transfusion within 12 hours of life (SP-SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T) could prevent IVH in EPI. METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis, case-historical control, of prospectively collected data from a pre-existing electronic neonatal database at a Saudi tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. We compared the IVH rate in EPI born in the first 4 years (Jan 2010-Dec 2013) of the SP-SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T period with that of EPI born during the last 4 years (Jan 2006-Dec 2009) of the rescue SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T period. RESULTS: The IVH rate was lower in the SP compared to the rescue- SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T period (30.8% versus 51.2%, odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.21, 0.88, p = 0.02). This difference remained significant after controlling for six other IVH risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Early SP-SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T may reduce the IVH rate in EPI. A large multicenter clinical trial is required for confirm the short and long-term benefit and risk of this intervention. Until then, early SP-SDP/Cryoprecipitate-T may be considered by an institution with a persistently high IVH rate.

Assessing the efficacy and cost of detergents used in a primary care automated washer disinfector.

Background: Cleaning of re-usable medical devices is a critical control point in the decontamination cycle, although defined end-points of the process are controversial. Objective: Investigate cleaning efficacy and cost of different detergent classes in an automated washer disinfector (AWD) designed for dental practice. Methods: Loads comprised test soiled dental hand instruments in cassettes and extraction forceps. Residual protein assayed using the International standard method (ISO 15883-5:2005) 1% SDS elution with ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) or GBox technology (on instrument OPA analysis). Short (60 minutes) and long (97 minutes) AWD cycles were used with four different classes of detergents, tap water and reverse osmosis water. Results: SDS elution analysis (N = 612 instruments) demonstrated four detergents with both wash cycles achieved equivalent cleanliness levels and below a threshold of 200 µg protein/instrument. GBox methodology (N = 575) using UK Department of Health threshold of 5 µg/instrument side demonstrated that tap water performed with the greatest efficacy for all types of instruments and cycle types. Conclusions: Using International standard methodology, different detergent classes had equivalence in cleaning efficacy. Cheaper detergents used in this study performed with similar efficacy to more expensive solutions. Findings emphasise the importance of validating the detergent (type and concentration) for each AWD.